(영문) 광주지방법원 해남지원 2015.12.03 2015고정87

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 해남지원 2015.12.03 2015고정87

특수협박등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 08:50 on January 30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) divided the sales contract with the victim D (the age of 65) who was found as an issue related to housing trading in the Defendant’s residence located in Ydonam-gun C, and divided the sales contract with the victim D (the age of 65) that had been cancelled; (b) the victim’s demand to return the purchase price that was already paid, was sniffed with the victim’s breath, and was sniffed with the victim’s bomb; and (c) the victim’s knife knife (the knth length, the total length of 20cm) brought the victim’s knife and knife the victim’s knife as the victim’s knife knif.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim and threatened him with dangerous objects.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of witness D;

1. Each police statement concerning D;

1. The record of seizure and the list of seizure [the defendant and his defense counsel] asserted that the defendant did not have any scarfe in the part of the victim, and that knife and did not have any knife to the victim. However, D, the victim, has consistently and specifically stated the situation of the occurrence of the case from the investigative agency to the court, the horses and actions of the defendant at the time of the case, etc., relatively consistent with the investigation agency, and the statements and actions of the defendant at the time of the case (a partial change in the order of the case may be seen

) The statements of E, a witness of the case, are consistent with the above statements of E, and most of the statements of D are credibility, and according to the above statements of D, it can be recognized that the facts of assault and intimidation were committed against the victim as stated in the facts of crime in the judgment of the defendant, and the above statements of the defendant and the defense counsel are not accepted.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.10.23 2015고합219 (1)

-광주지방법원 목포지원 2019.03.21 2018고합122

-부산지방법원 2018.09.17 2018고단3048

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2014.01.22 2013고합172

-의정부지방법원 2014.10.22 2014고단996