1. The Defendant shall start on September 3, 2015 with respect to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 10,000,000, and KRW 20,000,000, and each of the above amounts.

The fact that the Defendant borrowed KRW 10 million from the Plaintiff on October 19, 2010, and KRW 20,000 from the Plaintiff on October 19, 2010 is either a dispute between the parties, or a dispute is not between the parties, and the purport of the entire pleadings as a whole is considered in the items in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2.

According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff A 10,000,000 won, 20,000,0000 won to the plaintiff B, and 20,000,000 won to each of the above amounts, as requested by the plaintiffs, 20% per annum from September 3, 2015 to September 30, 2015 and 15% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment, as provided by the Special Act on the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, as requested by the plaintiffs.

As to this, the defendant asserts that he paid KRW 1,00,000 to the plaintiff A, the defendant paid KRW 1,000,000 to the plaintiff on three occasions at around 2013. There is no dispute between the parties. Meanwhile, according to the overall purport of the statement and arguments in the evidence No. 3-1 through No. 4, the defendant agreed to pay KRW 10,000 to the plaintiff at the time of borrowing KRW 10,000 from the plaintiff A without an agreement on separate due date and interest, but to pay KRW 10,000 to the extent that it was sold or borrowed after the date of sale or borrowing of the real estate owned by the defendant. After that, the plaintiff A requested the repayment of the loan by sending the content-certified mail to the defendant on four occasions from October 31, 201 to February 27, 2013. The monetary claim whose maturity is not fixed shall be paid first of all after the payment due date to the defendant, and the defendant paid KRW 10,000,00,000 per annum.

The defendant's above assertion is not accepted.

If so, the plaintiffs' claim of this case.