logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.08.22 2014노1727
강제추행
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Error of facts on the grounds of appeal and unfair sentencing

2. The judgment of this Court

A. The witness G of the lower court, the Defendant’s first instance judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts, stated to the effect that “the Defendant, with the right hand of the victim’s shoulder at the right hand, is memoryed. At that time, the Defendant is well aware of how the Defendant was blicking. It is well aware of how the Defendant was blicking. As such, the victim was flicking on the part of the Defendant, “A golf flicking in a golf course, a golf flicking, a flicking, and a glicking, within the only time.” The accompanied person stated to the effect that “I are flicking against the Defendant by this flicking.d., this is a sexual harassment.”

46,47 pages of the trial record No. 46, 47. The Defendant, upon receiving the first interrogation of the prosecution, stated to the effect that “The victim, upon arrival of 17 holes, said her “distury or her fright person,” was “disty or her fright person.”

55 pages of the evidence record No. 55. The victim stated at the police that “Ildddd and golf sweld within the ground” that “Ild and sweld inside the ground” was “Ild and sweld within the ground. I thought Ild that Ild and sweld was an act to play.” The victim stated the facts of damage as stated in the facts charged of this case in a specific and consistent manner until the court of original trial on the 14th and 15th

In light of the above contents of the statement, the judgment of the court below that found the victim guilty of the facts charged of this case by comprehensively taking account of other evidence duly adopted and examined in the testimony, recognizing the credibility of the witness examination procedure and directly undergoing the examination of evidence against the victim.

arrow