A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

From October 17, 2014 to July 2015, the Defendant continued to work as an insurance designer in various insurance companies, including Samsung Bio-stock Co., Ltd., Ltd., a company selling insurance products operated by the victim D in Jeju at the time of the purchase of insurance products from around October 17, 2014 to around July 2015.

1. When the insurance designer concludes an insurance contract, the Defendant paid the insurance contract in an insurance company on condition that the insurance contract maintains in excess of 12 months (AA life) or 18 months (hereinafter referred to as the same life), and first paid approximately 60% of the total fee in the month following the insurance contract, and first paid the remainder in monthly installments between 17 months, and then paid the remainder in the monthly installments from the insurance company to the insurance designer, and then paid the amount equivalent to the monthly payment for the insurance contract concluded by the insurance designer to the insurance company for 6 months after entering the insurance company, using the “subsidies system” that provides the amount of the monthly payment for the insurance contract made by the insurance designer to the insurance company for 13 months or longer, and then concluded the insurance contract under the name of the person who has no intent or ability to maintain the insurance contract for 13 months or longer, and intended

Accordingly, on October 22, 2014, the Defendant entered into an insurance contractor G with the insurance contractor, and paid KRW 332,200 as monthly insurance premium for the large social integration CI insurance products, and around that time, the Defendant applied for the payment of fees and subsidies as if he/she entered into a normal insurance contract with the victim D at the F branch of the Ethic branch of the Ethic branch of the Ethic branch of the Ethic branch.

However, in fact, the Defendant concluded a false insurance contract by lending the name of G, which is the insurance contractor, in order to receive the above recruitment fees and subsidies, and the Defendant thought that the insurance contract will be invalidated due to the failure to pay the insurance premium in lieu of the insurance premium for a certain period after paying it in lieu of the insurance premium.