logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.11.26 2014고정609
도박방조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 도박방조 피고인은 2014. 3. 7. 19:00경부터 같은 날 20:30경까지 여수시 B에 있는 피고인 운영의 ‘C 식당’에서 D 등 3명이 화투 48장을 사용하여 각자 패를 나누어 가진 후 돈을 걸고 화투의 끝수가 높은 사람이 판돈을 가져가는 방법으로 약 30회에 걸쳐 일명 ‘도리짓고땡’이라는 도박을 한다는 사실을 알면서도 이를 돕기 위하여 화투와 장소 등을 제공함으로써 이를 하여 방조하였다.

2. Although food service business operators in violation of the Food Sanitation Act should prevent gambling or other speculative acts or noise, the Defendant did not prevent three customers, such as D, from gambling in the above restaurant operated by the Defendant on the date and time stated in the above paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police interrogation protocol to D, E, or F;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 246 (1) and Article 32 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts (the occupation of gambling aid) and subparagraph 6 of Article 97 and Article 44 (1) of the Food Sanitation Act (the occupation of violation of the code of practice of food service providers);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (Punishment prescribed for a crime of violating the Food Sanitation Act of the largest punishment);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow