The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The fact that the defendant's judgment on the grounds for appeal (the grounds for appeal) recognizes all of the crimes of this case and is contrary to all of the crimes of this case, and the fact that the victim of the fraudulent act and the defendant agreed smoothly with the victim of the fraudulent act are considered in favor of the defendant.

However, the crime of this case is the case where the defendant, while working as an employee at a marriage counseling center, has obtained resident registration certificates, certificates of personal seal impression, etc. from G while being employed by his/her customer. It is not good that the crime of this case is committed because he/she obtained a loan from a financial institution as security of G while he/she committed the crime as if he/she was G and obtained a loan from a financial institution. The crime of this case is planned and executed closely. The defendant returned to China immediately after his/her escape from China, he/she was arrested about nine years only after his/her death in the Republic of Korea. After his/her arrest, the amount of damage was paid and agreed. The scope of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Commission for the crime of this case is from August to September of imprisonment, 200, [decision of types] the forgery of public documents [decision of imprisonment]], and then the basic or non-specific sentencing range of the defendant's imprisonment with prison labor for less than six months, such as forgery or alteration of public documents [decision of imprisonment with prison labor for less than six months]