The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The judgment of the court below which convicted the defendant of a mistake of fact even though the defendant did not have the intention to threaten the victim, and the defendant's words "the death of tea" with the knife alone does not constitute intimidation that could be a threat to the victim, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. In light of the various sentencing conditions in the instant case of unfair sentencing, the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant (two years of suspended sentence in six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

가. 이 사건 공소사실의 요지 피고인은 2012. 7. 22. 16:40경 김포시 D 단지상가 2동 105호에 있는 피고인 운영의 'E' 공인중개사 사무실에서 피해자 F(여, 49세)과 부동산 계약문제로 말다툼을 하다가 피해자가 무리한 요구를 한다는 이유로 화가 나 그 곳 주방에 있던 흉기인 빵써는 칼(칼날길이 약 11cm)을 들고 나와 “차라리 나를 죽여라”라고 말하면서 피해자를 위협하다가 다시 칼을 책상 위에 내려놓고 “어떻게 하시면 성이 풀리시겠냐, 저는 드릴 돈은 없고, 차라리 내 머리를 잡아 뜯으세요”라고 말하면서 머리를 피해자의 목 부위에 들이댔다.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim with a deadly weapon.

B. The judgment of the court below is affirmed by the following circumstances acknowledged by the record, i.e., (i) the defendant himself stated knife that “the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife”, and (ii) the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife.