beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Criminal facts
"2017 Highest 4060"
1. No one shall transfer any access medium unless otherwise specifically provided for in any other Act in using and managing the access medium;
Nevertheless, on August 5, 2017, the Defendant received a proposal that “the transfer of a card to make a loan” from a person who was not injured, and in response thereto, sent a card to the Defendant’s wife B by phone to the Defendant’s wife on the same day, and then sent a card to a place designated as a place where the card of the name of the party is required to be kept in the transaction office.
“C.” At the direction of the Defendant, the said B sent each of the cards connected to the Saemaul Treasury Account (Account Number: C) and the National Bank Account (Account Number: D) in the name of the Defendant at the New-dong Yangsan post office in Yangsan-si, Yangsan-si on the same day.
Accordingly, the defendant transferred the access media to the defendant.
"2018 Highest 76"
2. No one shall transfer any access medium used in electronic financial transactions;
On August 2017, 2017, the Defendant sent a physical card to grant a loan from a deceased person (the team leader of a single E team) with his/her name.
“A request” may not be returned even if a proposal was received, and the head of the passbook, etc. was sent to another person even before being returned, and the head of the passbook, etc. was used for the crime of fraud, and the head of the passbook, etc. again, may not be returned even if he/she
In addition, there is no means to receive a return, and there is no other means, at the same time, the two-party post offices located in Yangsan-si, Yangsan-si deliver one physical card connected to the defendant's bank F account in the name of the defendant to the above party in the name of the defendant, using the selective distribution service. On September 6, 2017, the above two-party post offices received the same proposal from the person who was not the name of the defendant (the name G team leader) and then delivered the same letter to the person who was not the name of the defendant (the name G team leader) using the selective distribution service.