Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around July 2010, the Defendant came to know of the fact that the Victim C and his son C filed a complaint with the Seoul Labor Relations Commission for occupational embezzlement of E, etc., the Defendant stated that “In the G Company’s office located in F2nd floor of Seoul Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, the Defendant would be able to detain and agree upon E by requesting the police officer's test to be well aware of the fact.” The Defendant stated that “The police officer assigned to the police officer in charge would have to conduct the personnel examination, which would change the street funds.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to detain E by requesting the police officer, etc.

Nevertheless, on July 31, 2010, the Defendant received 100,000 won cashier's checks from the G Company's office office around July 31, 2010, and paid 350,000 won of credit on the first floor of the above office.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained a total of KRW 1,350,000 and received money and valuables equivalent to KRW 1,350,000 in total under the pretext of soliciting or arranging the case or affairs handled by the public officials.

2. On September 201, 201, the Defendant filed a complaint with H as a crime of fraud at the office of the above G company, and came to know of the fact that H was under investigation at the Seoul Gangnam Police Station, the Defendant stated that “Before the establishment of a division at the Gangnam Police Station, the head of the division at the Yongsan Police Station, and at the present Yongsan Police Station, the head of the division has been employed at the same time. There is an entry that the head of the Gangnam Police Station and the head of the division work together with I, and I would request the police officer in charge to receive the case for which H filed a complaint against the police officer in charge through I.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to make the defendant receive a charge of fraud against a case in which H made a solicitation through I, and H was accused of fraud.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as such, makes a false statement, and thereafter, has the right to KRW 10 million at the above G company office around October 4, 201 from the victim.