A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On September 4, 2013, around 14:48, the Defendant:48, while driving a three-time alcohol measuring instrument in his/her own while drinking on the road in his/her direction, and caused a traffic accident, and the Defendant has considerable grounds to recognize that he/she had a large face while undergoing an investigation by a policeman E belonging to the D District Unit of the Busan High-gu Police Station D Zone of the Busan High-gu Police Station, and that he/she had a large number of smelling symptoms in his/her face, and that he/she was engaged in drinking, such as a long distance from September 4, 2013 to September 4: 48, 2013, the Defendant failed to comply with a request for a drinking test by a police officer without justifiable grounds, even though he/she was required to have a drinking measuring instrument taken three times in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F, G and H;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (1), a traffic accident report (2) (2) and a traffic accident report;

1. Report on the status of running a driving under the influence of alcohol, report on the status of driving under the influence of alcohol, register of using a drinking measuring instrument, and report on the status of driving under the influence of alcohol

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as photographs refusing measurement;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 148-2(1)2 and 44(2) of the Road Traffic Act regarding criminal facts and the argument of the defendant and his defense counsel do not operate the defendant's low-speed typing vehicle at the time, and that I merely driven the defendant's above vehicle on behalf of the defendant who was under the influence of alcohol and moved the defendant to a residential underground parking lot.

In accordance with the above argument by the Defendant and the defense counsel, the J, and I stated to the effect that “I, at the time of the call of the Defendant to receive the construction cost, had been driving the Defendant’s vehicle under the direction of only the Defendant, who was drunk, and his employee, brought the Defendant to the underground parking lot in the residence of the Defendant.” However, the case is a critical witness to clarify the end of the case.