logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 03. 29. 선고 2017두73822 판결
(심리불속행) 납세자가 부동산을 양도한 것을 사업의 포괄양도로 볼 수 없음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Busan High Court-2017-Nu-22886 ( November 24, 2017)

Title

(C) A taxpayer may not be deemed a comprehensive transfer of the business that the taxpayer transfers the real property.

Summary

Transfer of real estate by a taxpayer is not a comprehensive transfer of business but a transfer of inventory goods.

Related statutes

Article 9 (Supply of Goods)

Cases

2017Du73822 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Value-Added Tax

Plaintiff

○ ○

Defendant

○ Head of tax office

Imposition of Judgment

on October 29, 2018

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds stipulated in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per

arrow