logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2017.01.10 2016고단509
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The defendant shall pay 35,200,000 won to the applicant for compensation. The above compensation order shall be issued.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 2015, the Defendant married with D on November 2015, and had been married with E and has returned from approximately ten years ago, the Victim F is the South Korean partner of D, the Victim G is the F, and the Victim C is the South Korean partner of E.

1. On April 2015, the Defendant: (a) around the end of April 2015, the Victim G was expected to commence construction works of officetels at H on May 1, 2015 at the victim’s non-permanent restaurant located in the Daegu Suwon-gu Sidong-gu, Daegu-si; (b) the Defendant attempted to open a restaurant at the construction site and make it available for the public.

공사장 인부들을 상대로 함 바 식당을 운영하면 월 3,000~4,000 만 원 정도를 벌 수 있는데, 함 바 식당을 짓는 데 필요한 컨테이너 구입비와 부대비용만 준다면 처남댁에게 함 바 식당을 임대해 주겠다 ”라고 거짓말하였다.

However, in fact, the defendant did not receive the construction of an officetel from H at the time of the racing and there was no intention or ability to lease the restaurant to the victim even if he received money from the injured party because the defendant did not receive the construction of the officetel from H and the implementation of the construction was unclear.

On May 6, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 15 million from the damaged party to the bank account in the name of the Plaintiff, the wife, and received KRW 2.45 million in cash on May 20, 201.

2. Around March 2016, the Defendant: (a) called the victim’s telephone in the vicinity of the Sinsan-si J building, and “if the restaurant is delayed; and (b) if a vehicle is transferred to a restaurant, it is likely to enter the gasoline vehicle (the victim’s call) and then use it for commuting to and from work of its employees; and (c) then called the victim by calling the victim again before the end of May 2016, the Defendant called the victim that “I will substitute the vehicle by purchasing a heavy high-breadth halog car to and from work for its employees in the city,” and “I will have a SSM7 parking vehicle with a large halog car where ISM7 parking it in the Daegu detention house.”

However, the above fact is the halogex.

arrow