logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.11.13 2018노1439
자동차관리법위반
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The accused shall announce the summary of the judgment of innocence.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Fact-misunderstanding ① The Defendant did not know that he was exchanged before and after the halog haloga car’s first / after the last haloga car.

Therefore, there was no intention to give false notice of the performance and condition of the structure and device of the P Rexroth car.

2. The Defendant’s rupture and ruptures, etc.

did not discover damage to a part of a set.

Therefore, there was no intention to give false notice of the performance and condition of the structure, device, etc. of the car.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (2 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Ex officio determination

A. The Defendant is a person engaged in regular non-business checking the performance and condition of used cars in Seo-gu, Gwangju.

A. At around 13:00 on January 9, 2017, the Defendant: (a) checked the performance and condition of the structure, devices, etc. of a used motor vehicle, which is a used motor vehicle, in the foregoing industrial company; and (b) knew that the said motor vehicle was an accident vehicle that had been repaired before and after the steering day; (c) indicated “free” on the column for the inspection of performance and condition of a used motor vehicle (excluding simple repair) and delivered it without indicating the particulars of the said repair in the vehicle’s condition column; and (d) notified the victim G of the performance and condition of the said vehicle’s structure, device, etc.

B. On June 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) checked the performance and condition of the structure, apparatus, etc. of the HHH-ray car; and (b) confirmed that the rubber barge of a speed-based type snick, such as the power transmission device of the said car, requires maintenance, such as tearing, and leakage generated; but (c) confirmed that the Defendant was in need of maintenance, such as the transmission of power of the record of inspection of performance and condition of used cars.

By marking the "Franp" in the Art column and delivering it, the victim I notified the victim I of the performance and condition of the structure, device, etc. of the said car.

(b)attached Form 5 of relevant regulations;

arrow