A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On June 7, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the method of flooding, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 4, 2018.

Although a charter contract was established with a deposit of KRW 130 million on the real estate owned by the Defendant, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, 111-dong 1301, the Defendant forged the contract as if the lease contract was established, and submitted it to the lender to obtain a loan smoothly from the lending company.

1. On May 2017, the Defendant forged private documents and the event of the above investigation documents at the Defendant’s house located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and on the Internet by using Nowon-gu’s computers for the foregoing reasons, the Defendant downloaded the form of a monthly contract for real estate on the Internet, and then entered the real estate in the column for the location of the real estate into the column for the location of the real estate as “Seoul Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, 111 Dong 1301,” “10 million won” in the deposit column, “5 million won” in the rent column, “E” in the lessee column and “F” in the broker column.

E, F’s seal was affixed.

On June 5, 2017, the Defendant continued to deliver the monthly rent contract of the said real estate as if it was a document duly formed, at the office of loan of e.g., an infant in Ansan-si, who was aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged and exercised a monthly rental contract for real estate, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On June 5, 2017, the Defendant: (a) issued a monthly rental agreement with a child who was victimized by a child at the leat office; and (b) issued a forged real estate monthly rental agreement with the Defendant as mentioned in the preceding paragraph; and (c) fraudulently concluded a lease agreement with the Defendant’s real estate deposit amounting to KRW 10 million; and (d) subsequently, the Defendant borrowed KRW 10 million from the victim on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Loan transaction contract and transaction statement;