Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On March 22, 2019, the Defendant: (a) opened a boundary survey on February 21, 2019 by the victim C, who is the owner of the above land, to the permanent salary branch of the Korea Land Information Corporation; and (b) opened a boundary survey on February 21, 2019; and (c) opened eight posts (35 cm in length) of plastic materials in a manner of carrying them into fire.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Some of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. An investigation report (D counterpart investigation), investigation report (the telephone conversation of the team leader), investigation report (the confirmation of the result of partition survey, the result of partition survey, the situation of investigation progress (the details of the date and number of the destruction and damage of objects), the result of cadastral survey, the result of boundary restoration survey, the location of the measurement point, the land disclosure status, the investigation report (on-site confirmation), the site photo, the full certificate of registered matters, the investigation report (the counter investigation of the cadastral engineer), the boundary marking sign photo, the investigation report [the defendant and the defense counsel] [the defendant and the defense counsel are installed by a wrong survey and the defendant knew that the victim had no intention of damage because he/she had no intention of damage since he/she knew that the previous posts were extracted from another survey.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., ① the Defendant’s request to the Daegu Regional Headquarters of the Korea Land Information Corporation on March 22, 2019 and conducted a new survey again, but there was no difference between the result of the previous survey; ② even if the Defendant alleged that the result of the previous survey was wrong, he did not have the authority to damage posts installed according to the previous survey conducted by the Korea Land Information Corporation; ③ the Defendant was the victim at the time of the previous survey.