logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.05.11 2016고정133
상해
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant and the victim C are relatives.

On December 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, such as spiting the head debt on the victim’s body, spiting the head debt on the victim’s body, and spiting the head debt on the victim’s body, and spiting the head debt on the victim’s hand, while the Defendant was in dispute with the victim on the road in front of Ansan-si, Ansan-si, Masan-si.

As a result, the defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the left side of the two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the spits of injuries (the defendant and his defense counsel merely spits C's spits while being assaulted against C, and they do not spit C's spits with spits in two hand.

The following circumstances revealed by each of the above evidence, i.e., ① the victim C was punished by the Defendant and the other party’s head, consistently from the investigative agency to this court.

(2) The defendant also made a statement that the victim was assaulted by the victim by the investigative agency, and that the victim was satisd by the victim.

(4) In full view of the fact that a hospital was diagnosed by the head of the right side, etc. at the time two days (the day following the day on which the crime was committed) after the day on which the crime was committed (the day on which the victim was committed) after the day on which the victim was committed, a police official who was called to the scene of the crime after receiving a report may sufficiently recognize the fact that the victim’s head debt was hidden by his hand, and thus the defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion is groundless).

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.

arrow