logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.02.15 2015고단1494
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at around 23:40 on July 27, 2015, on the street in front of the Cuk-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju, Cheongju, was carrying the Defendant on a taxi, and arrived at the said D airport parking lot, and the Defendant’s request that F.L. police officers assigned to the said district guard and slope G, who were in the said area at the said district c.m., “I am going to the destination, without getting out of it, and instead, I am to the desire to take a bath.”

The lower court stated that the taxi driver was “in the taxihouse.”

Accordingly, the Defendant is in place on the ground that it is bad for the Defendant to do so, and, “Is to see this Madern, Madern.”

In addition, F's face of the drinking environment has been displayed.

Therefore, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Written or written statements of E or G production;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to arrest and report cases;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act ( considered favorable circumstances among the following grounds for sentencing)

1. The scope of the recommended punishment on the sentencing criteria [the scope of the recommended punishment] and the basic area (six months to one year and four months) (the prevention of interference with the performance of official duties and the coercion of official duties) shall be limited to the category 1 (the prevention of interference with the performance of official duties).

2. Determination of sentence: (a) the contents and results of the instant crime; (b) the circumstances after the commission of the crime; (c) the Defendant reflects the Defendant; (d) the Defendant has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime; and (e) the conditions of sentencing specified in the oral argument of the instant case are taken into account within the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines by the sentencing committee of the Supreme Court.

arrow