beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on January 24, 2005 with respect to the real estate stated in the attached Form (hereinafter “instant real estate”).
B. On January 5, 2011, the Defendant sold the instant real estate to C by setting the sales price of KRW 380 million.
(hereinafter “instant First Sales Contract”) C.
C On June 7, 2011, on behalf of the Defendant, on the part of the Plaintiff, the sales price was KRW 9.5 million and sold a part 496 square meters indicated in the attached drawing among the instant real estate.
(hereinafter “the 2nd sales contract”) D.
The Plaintiff paid to C the sum of KRW 4.5 million on June 7, 2011, and KRW 3.6 million on June 9, 2011, as the down payment and intermediate payment under the instant secondary sales contract.
[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 4-2, 2-1 through 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1-1, 1-2, 5-5, Eul evidence Nos. 1-12, and part of Gap evidence No. 2-1 [No. 2-1 (Real Estate Sales Contract) shall be deemed to have been made with the defendant's writing or seal, and the authenticity of the whole pleadings shall not be acknowledged], and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination
가. 대리권 주장에 관한 판단 ⑴ 원고의 주장 ㈎ 원고는 피고로부터 적법한 대리권한을 수여받은 C와 사이에 이 사건 제2매매계약을 체결하였다.
㈏ 그 후 원고는 피고의 이 사건 제2매매계약상 채무 불이행을 원인으로 2011. 10. 25.경 피고의 대리인 C에게 이 사건 제2매매계약에 대한 해지 통지를 하였고, 2012. 2. 3. 피고의 대리인 C와 사이에 이 사건 제2매매계약에 대한 해지 합의를 하였다.
㈐ 따라서 그 원상회복으로 피고는 원고에게 매매대금 4500만 원 및 이에 대한 지연손해금을 지급할 의무가 있다.
The evidence submitted by the Plaintiff (excluding part of the evidence No. 2-1 as mentioned above) is alone.