logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2019.08.28 2018고정237
폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Defendant and victim B (the age of 32) are de facto marital relations.

On June 9, 2018, around 22:14, the Defendant: (a) committed a dispute between the victim and his/her family member, etc. in the building C, which is his/her residence; (b) committed an assault against the victim, such as the victim’s spawn part of the spawn part by hand, and the spawn part of the spawn part of the victim’s spawn part

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. B accusation;

1. The Defendant and his defense counsel’s defense counsel’s assertion on the 112 Reporting Case Handling Manual, arguing that the Defendant and his defense counsel did not commit the criminal facts as indicated in the judgment, stating that “the Defendant’s body did not interfere with the body of the victim several times or a part of the victim’s body. It is merely a civilian of the part of the victim’s clan.”

The victim consistently states the situation from the investigative agency to the court of law, how to commit the crime, how to commit the crime, etc.

In addition, the Defendant stated in the investigative agency that “the victim was suffering from a telephone to the other side of the victim in a mobile phone, the victim was trying to pay a cell phone to the other side of the victim, and the victim was pushed down about about 5-6 times in his hand, and the victim went back to the extent that he was forced to do so. In addition, even though he was able to take the victim’s hand, he did not know or she did not look at the victim’s hand.” In addition, the Defendant made a statement to the effect that he was pushed down on the right edge of the victim, and accordingly, he went back to the right edge of the victim.”

In light of the statement of a victim and the statement of a defendant in an investigative agency, it may be recognized that the defendant committed an act of criminal facts stated in the judgment.

Therefore, the defendant and his defense counsel are not accepted.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. The Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

arrow