Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On April 4, 2018, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court's Ansan-dong branch.

On August 1, 2019, the Defendant driven a F Lasta car in the state of alcohol with approximately 00 meters alcohol concentration of 0.122% in the section of about 100 meters from the front of C in Ansan-si B to the front of E in Ansan-si.

As a result, the Defendant violated the regulations on the prohibition of drunk driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The survey report on the actual condition, the report on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver, the investigation report (report on the circumstances of the drinking driver), and the inquiry into the results of the crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records and other inquiries, investigation reports (verification of criminal records by a suspect), confirmation of the same kind of records as the suspect, each judgment, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of summary order;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant had been sentenced to three times a fine due to drunk driving under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and repeated the instant crime.

The blood alcohol level of the instant case is not low, and the previous years of drinking driving was also the year of 2018, and two years have not passed since it was the previous years of drinking driving.

However, only the defendant has been sentenced to a fine and has no record of being punished more than the suspension of the execution of imprisonment.

The sentence identical to the order shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account such circumstances as the defendant's age, character and conduct, and environment and all the conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case.