1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. The plaintiffs are family owners, and the defendant is bound by the defendant.

B. On October 18, 2013, Plaintiff A1, the Defendant stated to the Plaintiff that “A, on October 18, 2013, the Plaintiff, “I will die and have his husband attend the business without having to exercise the right of repayment of the Party.” The Plaintiff received a loan from the Plaintiff in an uneasible manner, and had the Plaintiff perform the right of repayment by bringing the Plaintiff into cash the amount of KRW 6 million on October 20 of the same year. 20 of the same year. The Defendant: (a) at any time thereafter, the Plaintiff was in a new position; (b) the Plaintiff was within KRW 200,000 and KRW 50,000,000,000 per the first half of each month; and (c) the Plaintiff did not die before the new Party, and the Plaintiff was in a business, and the Plaintiff did not die with her husband, and the Plaintiff did not have to have his her her son and his her her her her her son and her son do so.

Accordingly, the plaintiff paid the value or unconstitutional money to the defendant in cash as the defendant did, and he saw the beginning value, fruit, sugar, etc.

3) The Defendant paid KRW 1 million to the Plaintiff in cash on the basis that the Plaintiff was in an additional value of KRW 1 million at a time, and received KRW 500,000 in cash on the ground that if the Plaintiff did not cut off the breadth between the nivers and the nivers of January due to the nivers of the nivers and the nivers of January, and received KRW 500,000 in cash on the ground that the Plaintiff was within KRW 500,000 in cash. In addition, when the Defendant frequently went to the Plaintiff on February 2014, the Defendant: (a) stated that the nivers of the nivers of the color that the nivers of the Plaintiff frequently went to the Plaintiff, and paid the niversing to the Plaintiff; and (b) demanded that the nivers equipment be sold from time to time after that time.

5 Accordingly, the defendant, from time to time, forced the plaintiff to be a new one, received the value of the exercise of the contract, and then acquired a considerable amount of money at a cost much less than the value of the money received as the performance of the contract. The defendant borrowed money by taking advantage of the state of the plaintiffs' poor condition and borrowed money to the defendant, which is an essential thing for life, necessary for the defendant.