beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Crime of Crimes, etc.] On October 7, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years by imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapon, etc.) at the Gwangju District Court on the grounds of a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 15, 2015. The Defendant is a member of the behavior group of "C", which is a violent crime group that
[Criminal facts] 2017 Highest 566
1. The Defendant, on November 29, 2016, sells S7 mobile phones at the gallon of a trading website around the Internet.
The phrase “I wish to sell a mobile phone to 330,000 won, and if you send half of the sales amount first, I want to send a mobile phone to her home page” to the victim D (30,000 won) who reported and contacted this advertisement.
However, although the defendant had a mobile phone, he thought that he sold it in other middle and high sales, so even if he received the mobile phone payment from the injured party, he did not think that he sold the mobile phone to the injured party.
Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the victim as above and transferred 30,000 won in total to the deposit account of a national bank opened in the name of the defendant, including 160,000 won on December 16, 2016 and 170,000 won on December 5, 2016, from the person who is affiliated with the victim, under the name of the defendant.
Accordingly, the defendant was given property from the victim by deceiving the victim.
2. A special assault: (a) on January 1, 2017, the Defendant: (b) was trying to leave a day by driving a rash car in front of the Felel located in 1, 2017, on the ground that a car, such as the victim H (26), does not turn off on a street and turn off a car.
During that period, the victim who became aware of the fact that the defendant was driving a drinking, reported to 112, and the defendant tried to escape because the police would be aware of the driving of drinking, but the victim could not expect and escape from the vehicle.