Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
The defendant shall obtain money of 370,000 won by fraud to the applicant C, and 300.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On May 8, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud in the Jinwon District Court's Jinju branch, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Common Detention House on November 5, 2015. On March 24, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months and a fine of one million won in the same court for the same crime, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Jinju Prison on July 25, 2017.
Around November 8, 2017, the Defendant posted a letter on the Defendant’s home located in Jinju-si, 105 Dong apartment 1502, stating that he/she sold an Internet portal site, to the Internet portal site, and that he/she sold the said letter to the victim H who reported and contacted with the said article, and said he/she would transfer the price to the victim H.
However, the Defendant did not have the above spreading and did not have any intention or ability to sell the spread to the victim even if he received money from the victim as the sales proceeds.
The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 450,00 from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative account (number I) under the name of the Defendant as the sales proceeds of the same day, and received KRW 14,721,00 in total from November 20, 2017, from that time, from November 20, 2017, as shown in the list of crimes in attached Table 1, the Defendant received total of KRW 14,721,00 under the same name, from the victim
Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.
around August 6, 2017, the Defendant posted a letter on the Defendant’s home located in Jinju-si 105 dong G apartment 1502 dong 105 dong 1502 to sell “gal jum 5” by accessing the Internet market and selling “gal jum 5”, and said that he would sell the said mobile phone to the victim Jin who reported and contacted the above letter.
However, the defendant did not have the above mobile phone so that he did not have any intention or ability to sell the mobile phone to the victim even if he receives money from the victim as the sales proceeds.
The Defendant is identical to this.