(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.02.04 2014고정3476

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.02.04 2014고정3476

협박

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

Where the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 7, 2014, at around 21:24, the Defendant sent a text message to the victim, “I think that the victim L (the age of 12) was bullyinged by the Defendant’s wife, the Defendant sent to the victim a text message, “I see where I am scherb, scherb, scherb, scherb, scherb, scherb, scired, scired, scired, scired, scired, and good.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Written statement by prosecution;

1. Statement of the police concerning L;

1. Details of the written complaint, letters sent by the suspect, and additional warning given to the victim;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (a copy of theA written opinion);

1. Relevant Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's defense counsel's defense counsel's assertion of the provisional payment order under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserts that although the defendant's defense counsel sent text messages to the victim as stated in the facts constituting a crime, it did not specifically give notice of harm and injury in its contents, and even without such notice, it does not constitute a crime of intimidation since it

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence of the judgment are as follows: (a) the Defendant sent the victim a voice, such as spreading water to C, who is the mother of the victim, while his/her mother and the school where the Defendant was accompanied by his/her father on March 6, 2014, which is the day before the instant case; and (b) the Defendant’s wife sent the victim a car text message to the victim, “I would like to take a view at the Malithal Driving Institute, I would like to take a 2throthr and write down and take a kylloga, I would like to take a kine text message, and I would like to take a kyllog with the victim on the day of the instant case.” (c) The Defendant sent the victim the victim a fighting set up in G Kao Kao that the Defendant Dozed the victim on the day of the instant case.

참조조문

유사 판례

-춘천지방법원 원주지원 2017.07.06 2017고단457

-제주지방법원 2015.11.19 2015고정652

-서울북부지방법원 2019.08.21 2019고정471

-대구지방법원 2013.06.27 2013고정973

-서울동부지방법원 2013.11.15 2012고단3314