logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017. 5. 24. 선고 2016누77225 판결
[장해급여청구][미간행]
Plaintiff, Appellant

Plaintiff (Attorney Seo-soo et al., Counsel for plaintiff-appellant)

Defendant, appellant and appellant

Korea Labor Welfare Corporation

Conclusion of Pleadings

April 19, 2017

The first instance judgment

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2016Gudan56427 decided November 4, 2016

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

On April 4, 2016, the Defendant’s disposition of additional payment of disability benefits against the Plaintiff is revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

The reasoning of this Court is that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is stated in the part of the reasoning of the judgment, except for adding "(the claim for insurance benefits under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act is a public procedure under the laws and regulations, and there is a clear form as a public procedure under the laws and regulations, so it should be viewed differently from the highest notice without any restriction on the form conducted by the general official)" to the following: therefore, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Cho Jong-tae (Presiding Judge)

arrow