Plaintiff, Appellant
Plaintiff (Attorney Seo-soo et al., Counsel for plaintiff-appellant)
Defendant, appellant and appellant
Korea Labor Welfare Corporation
Conclusion of Pleadings
April 19, 2017
The first instance judgment
Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2016Gudan56427 decided November 4, 2016
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1. Purport of claim
On April 4, 2016, the Defendant’s disposition of additional payment of disability benefits against the Plaintiff is revoked.
2. Purport of appeal
The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Quotation of the first instance judgment
The reasoning of this Court is that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is stated in the part of the reasoning of the judgment, except for adding "(the claim for insurance benefits under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act is a public procedure under the laws and regulations, and there is a clear form as a public procedure under the laws and regulations, so it should be viewed differently from the highest notice without any restriction on the form conducted by the general official)" to the following: therefore, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.
Judges Cho Jong-tae (Presiding Judge)