beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. The defendant (appointed party) is the defendant 2,390 square meters of 1,50 m2,00,000 Sung-gu, Sungnam-gu and Sungnam-gu Jin-gu 2.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. From 197 to 197, the Plaintiff publicly announced a plan for compensation for incorporated land and obstacles under the former Act on Special Cases Concerning the Acquisition of Land for Public Use and the Compensation for Loss (amended by Act No. 6656, Feb. 4, 2002; hereinafter “former Special Cases Act”) to the owners of land and interested parties in the land in the Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City and the BA Dong for the purpose of creating AY.
B. Since then from around 1998 to 2006, the Plaintiff acquired the land subject to the “land” as indicated in the annexed Table 2. List from around 1998 to around 2006 by means of consultation under the former Act on the Acquisition of Land, etc. for Public Works and the Compensation therefor (hereinafter “Public Works Act”), with respect to the land in the Jung-gu AZdong and the BAdong zone in Seongbuk-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “each of the instant land”), and paid compensation to the original owner. As of each of the instant land, the registration of ownership transfer was completed by agreement on the acquisition of public land in the future of the Plaintiff as of the day indicated on the “date of acquisition” in the annexed Table 2
C. Meanwhile, before the Plaintiff acquired each of the instant land through consultation, the Defendant (Appointed Party), the Appointed Party, and the Defendants were cultivated by leasing each of the instant land to a plastic house, etc., and the Plaintiff was above.
Notwithstanding the notice of the compensation plan under paragraph, the agreement on compensation for losses was reserved due to the shortage of budget, etc. from the end of 2011 to the end of 2013. However, in the case of Defendant F, G, and H, the agreement was concluded between the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the designated party and the Defendants on each of the instant land or parts thereof (However, in the case of Defendant F, G, and H, the agreement was not concluded on the loan of 1,874 square meters at Sungnam-gu AX-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, and hereinafter “each of the instant loan agreements”).
Since then, the existing purpose of the AY creation is virtually impossible in the site including each of the instant land, and the Plaintiff is each of the instant land in the BB expansion project.