Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 15, 2017, the Defendant who damaged property was an employee in a written indictment operated by the victim C when he/she was in harmony with the victim C on July 15, 2017.

E, although it is written in E, it is reasonable to regard C, the operating entity of the above restaurant, as the injured party, and the accused also claims it, so the above facts charged are modified and recognized as such.

In the frequency of ‘D' dialogueed with a kind of friendly and drinking and abrupted fluorial problem, the odor flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium and flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium and flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property managed by the injured party.

2. The Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant, at the same time and at the same place as the above paragraph 1, was gathering things, and assaulting the above restaurant customer F with which the Defendant was restraind, thereby interfering with the Defendant’s restaurant business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. Each receipt and photograph;

1. A investigation report (CCTV verification), CD;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Submission of written estimates to Victims E);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of a fine for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the said Act (the punishment shall be aggravated for concurrent crimes with the punishment determined by a crime of interference with heavier business, but it shall be limited to the extent that the aggregate of the amounts of two crimes is aggregated);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was that the Defendant was punished by a fine as an violent crime in 1998, 2003, 2005, and 2008 of the Criminal Procedure Act. On July 14, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment and 2 years of suspended execution for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the support of Suwon Flag Flag and Sungnam, and was sentenced to 8 months of suspended sentence and 2 years of drinking.