logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.07.08 2013가단63597
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 35,922,49 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from November 30, 2012 to July 8, 2015.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition B, which was constructed on November 30, 2012 by a corporation, operated a DNA excavating machine owned by Busan Construction Corporation at the construction site of the sewage culvert in Pyeongtaek-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Hadung Construction Co., Ltd., and was laid underground with the Plaintiff, etc. Around 16:0 of the Do, B, who performed the above work, destroyed the ground where B would lay sewage pipe from the ground where he was laid underground, and destroyed the boomet with the boom boomet so that he left the ground where he was laid underground. At that time, while the Plaintiff was laid underground, the Plaintiff did not have any dispute over the above boom construction contract between the parties, such as the Plaintiff, and the insurer of the said 2, 3, 4, and 5.

B. According to the above facts, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages caused by the accident in this case pursuant to Articles 3 and 10 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act and Article 724 (2) of the Commercial Act as the insurer of the above sowing machine.

2. Except as otherwise provided under the scope of damages, the entry in the corresponding item in the separate sheet of calculation of damages shall be the same as the description in the separate sheet of calculation of damages, and the period of convenience in calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

Personal information 1): Occupation and income shown in the annexed sheet for calculation of damages in attached Form 2. The plaintiff is operating a construction company specializing in piping business.

On December 31, 2003, the business was closed, and the date of the accident in this case is about 4 days.

arrow