The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. On February 1, 2016, from around 14:00 to around 16:00, the Defendant: (a) brought about the issue of ownership of the victim D and neighboring land in the dry field of Mineyang-si; and (b) subsequently, the Defendant destroyed the total market price of 40 years of debris 10gs of debris 10gs of debris and 4gs of debris bris bris 20 years of debris by using the refratator.

2. According to the Defendant’s partial legal statement and witness E’s partial legal statement, the Defendant demanded the victim’s smaller mother, E, but, without complying with the victim’s request, E did not comply with the request and responded to “NV”. After that, the Defendant can recognize the fact of cutting trees by requesting an article who was working in relation to the FF development projects of the Korea Rural Community Corporation at the time.

B. At the request of the defendant, there is not sufficient evidence to confirm the accurate quantity, location (in particular, whether the above C land is or not other land or not), and ownership relation of the trees, (in accordance with the evidence submitted up to the present time, only the fact that the trees, upon the request of the defendant, are trees on the land that were not expropriated by the Korea Rural Community Corporation). Accordingly, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge the facts charged, thereby not guilty by the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

In addition, the summary of this decision is published in accordance with Article 58 (2) of the Criminal Code.