A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 03:44, the victim C in the Chungcheongnam-gun B, Chungcheongnam-dong, Chungcheongnam-dong; (b) opened a door door by hand; (c) intruded into that door; and (d) 10 km of rice equivalent to KRW 110,00 in the market price owned by the victim, which was kept in the cooling house, and stored in the cooling house, etc.; (d) 10 kg of rice, net, 10 knifed, 10 knifed, 10 knifed, knifed, knifed, knifed, knifed, knifed, knifed, 2 knifed, knif

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement prepared by C;

1. A report on internal investigation and each accompanying photograph;

1. Reasons for sentencing Article 330 of the Criminal Act, Article 330 of the Criminal Act, where the protocol of seizure and the statutes on the list of seizure are applicable (Article applicable

1. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the type of punishment] shall be limited to the scope of the punishment [the scope of the punishment shall be reduced by up to 1/2, since only two persons who are specially mitigated exist, the lowest limit of the sentence shall be reduced by 1/2);

2. A person who has not yet received a letter of suspicion from the injured party is punished for the accused.

On the other hand, however, there is a reason to consider the motive and circumstance of the defendant's act of stealing the food into another person's hall in order to keep the pain without suffering from the sacrific pain while the defendant was economically lacking.

In addition, the crime of this case was committed once, and some of the damages were returned.

The defendant was committed by the crime of this case, and his mistake was divided, and he was punished three times for the crime of this case, and there was no other criminal records.

The above conditions of sentencing revealed in the trial process of this case are considered as disadvantageous or favorable to the defendant.