logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원김천지원 2016.08.24 2015가단4517
손해배상(기)
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 4,527,192, Plaintiff B, and C, respectively, KRW 500,00 and each of the said money from May 21, 2014.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

(a) D is a public official of Grade 8 in the local facility management position as a person in charge of the inspection of F Middle School Safety Facilities under the defendant under the jurisdiction of the defendant in the Gu and Grade 6 in the local education administration position as the head of F Middle School Administration Office and the person in charge of safety facility management.

B. Around May 1, 2014, D and G conducted a safety inspection of the safety sealing installed on the outer wall of the window of the F Middle School class, and did not confirm whether there is a brush attached to the connecting string of the safety rod, and whether there is no brush, and even though there was an occupational duty to prevent accidents in advance due to fall, it did not neglect the duty of care to prevent accidents, and did not confirm it as a hand and not.

C. On May 21, 2014, at around 12:50, Plaintiff A was faced with an accident falling into the first floor flower below 12 meters from the wind, where the safety strings (hereinafter “instant accident”) of FF Middle School’s third grade 3 grade 3 grade 201, with her her her fel, and her her her fel, seated with his her her her her her her fel, and with his her her her her fel at the outer wall of the window of the classroom (hereinafter “instant safety felball”). Accordingly, Plaintiff A suffered injury, such as pulverging her flading down the flabbing her lag, which requires treatment for eight weeks.

D and G were indicted due to the facts described in the above B and C, and sentenced to a fine by the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch of 2015 High Court Decision 2015 High Court Decision 252. D appealed, but dismissed, and D appealed is currently pending in the final appeal.

E. The plaintiff B and C are the parents of the plaintiff A.

[Reasons for Recognition] The written evidence Nos. 3, 4, 8, and Eul No. 3 (including paper numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the above facts of recognition, it is necessary to conduct safety inspections on the safety sealing installed on the windows outer walls of the F Middle School class D and G, who are public officials belonging to the defendant.

arrow