(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.10.24 2019노1886

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.10.24 2019노1886

사기

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Although the defendant was delivered a map of KRW 4.95 million from the victim on July 16, 2008, the defendant did not receive a map of KRW 4.69 million on August 13, 2008.

With respect to the cash custody certificate as stated in the judgment below (hereinafter “the cash custody certificate of this case”), the victim requested the defendant to establish a joint and several surety and prepare a cash custody certificate. At the time, the defendant requested the I who introduced the fraternity of this case to provide a joint and several surety, and the defendant received the fraternity, and the defendant, the victim, I, and the accounting of the fraternity of this case was collected in both the amount and the date are blank, and only the part of the cash custodian and the joint and several surety were prepared in the cash custody certificate of this case

Nevertheless, the victim appears to have forged the cash custody certificate of this case, stating one million won in the face value column of the cash custody certificate of this case.

After receiving the fraternity money, the victim demanded to pay 830,000 won as the deposit amount of each week.

At the time of Amama, it seems that the defendant joined the 2nd unit of the 5 million foot mold and demanded 8.3 million won to be paid in the 2nd unit.

The Defendant lent the money received on July 16, 2008 to F, but the F was unable to pay the money that the F borrowed.

Accordingly, the F and the victim agreed to pay the credit in full in the future.

After that, on June 2016, the victim was found to be the Defendant’s own working company and the F was unable to correct the unpaid part of the paid-in amount.

The defendant, who was aware of the fact that the deposit was paid in full through F, was fully paid in full, is called the "written pledge in this case" as stated in the holding of the court below stating that "the victim will repay 2 million won up to July 31, 2016, on the condition that the victim will complete the payment in full with any circumstance."

was drawn up.

Since then, 80,000 won and 1,360,000 won each time as the written pledge of this case shall be the victim.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.06.07 2018고정2146

-광주지방법원 2019.11.28 2019고정894

-서울북부지방법원 2015.08.27 2015노498

-의정부지방법원 2012.12.06 2012고단1108

-창원지방법원 통영지원 2019.11.20 2019고단334