beta
Text
1. The defendant,
A. 4,320,00 won to the Plaintiff (Appointeds), 1,840,000 won to the Appointeds C, and 7,333.
Reasons
1. The plaintiff (appointed)'s assertion
A. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party; hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff”) was employed by the Defendant who operates the Agricultural, Marine and Livestock Products Distribution Center, and retired from office from office from September 24, 2014 to November 27, 2014. The Defendant was not paid KRW 1.35,00 won of wages on September 24, 2014, KRW 2.7 million of wages on October 2014, KRW 270,000 of wages on November 2014, KRW 4.320,000 of wages on November 27, 2014.
B. The Appointor C was employed by the Defendant and retired from office from office from October 15, 2014 to November 27, 2014, but did not receive wages of 1840,000 won from the Defendant on November 1, 2014.
C. The Appointor D was employed by the Defendant and retired from office from office from September 17, 2014 to November 27, 2014. However, the Defendant did not receive the total of KRW 2 million wage of September 2014, KRW 4 million on October 2014, KRW 1,33,000 on November 201, and KRW 7,333,300 on November 201.
E was employed by the Defendant and retired from office from office from September 17, 2014 to November 26, 2014. However, the Defendant did not receive KRW 1.6 million wage of September 2014; KRW 3.2 million wage of October 2014; and KRW 1,066,00 for November 201, 2014.
E. The Appointor F was employed by the Defendant and retired from office from office from October 30, 2013 to December 16, 2014. However, the monthly wage of KRW 2,016,130 for February 2, 2014, and KRW 2,50,000 for each month from March 3 to November 2014, and the monthly wage of KRW 483,870 for December 2014, total of KRW 27,968,149 for retirement allowances and KRW 27,968,149 for retirement allowances.
2. The Defendant, who received a duplicate of the instant complaint and submitted a written reply on June 15, 2015, did not clearly dispute the Plaintiff’s assertion. Moreover, even if the Plaintiff appeared on the date of the first and second pleadings of the instant case and did not clearly dispute the facts alleged by the Plaintiff, it is deemed that the Defendant led to confession pursuant to the main sentence of Article 150(1) of the Civil Procedure Act.
Therefore, the defendant has retired from the date of retirement of the plaintiff and the designated parties as to each of the wages listed in the order of Paragraph 1.