1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s claim is all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff (appointed party).

1. Basic facts

A. The parties, etc. 1) E and F were married and were 2 South and North 5 women under the chain of marriage. The Selection B was 3/10 shares in E’s property under Article 109 of the former Civil Act (amended by Act No. 471 of Feb. 2, 1958, and amended by Act No. 3051 of Dec. 31, 197), and the Plaintiff was 3/10 shares in the Plaintiff’s shares, 2/10 shares in the Plaintiff’s 2/10 shares, 1/20 shares in the Selection B and G, 20 shares in the Selection, 1/20 shares in the Selection, 3/20 shares in the Selection, 3/10 shares in the Selection, 3/10 shares in the Selection, 3/10 shares in the SH, 1/10 shares in the SH, 1/10/10 shares in each case.

3) On April 8, 201, F died, and the said 7 South Korea inherited F’s property each 1/7 equity shares. B. As to the ownership of real estate, etc. under the name of F (i) 1), the transfer registration of F’s ownership was made on April 28, 1973 with respect to the 595 square meters and the 46 square meters in K (hereinafter “J and K’s land”).

2F On December 19, 1985, as regards J and K land, the same month for the first time.

6. The registration of ownership transfer was completed due to sale.

3) Attached 1 land listed in Attached 2 List (hereinafter “instant land”).

) On April 7, 2009, the land was divided into JJ large 595 square meters, and the land listed in the attached Table 2 List 2 (hereinafter “instant land”).

(A) On March 10, 2010, JJ large 595 square meters was divided into three lands listed in the attached Table 2 list (hereinafter “instant three lands”).

(4) On April 7, 2009, I divided the ownership transfer registration for the land of this case into the Defendant on the ground of consultation on the land of this case on June 4, 2009, and the registration of ownership transfer for the land of this case on the ground of consultation on the land of this case on the 3th day of the same month, and on the same day on May 10, 2010, on the land of this case, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on the ground of consultation on the public land of this case.

5) On July 9, 2009, the land category of the instant 1 and 3 was changed to a road. [The grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7 (each entry, including number, and the purport of the whole pleadings)

2. The plaintiff.