logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.12.27 2015고단3461
횡령
Text

[Defendant A] The 1-A and 2-B of the judgment of Defendant A are punished by imprisonment for one year, and the 1-B of the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant A was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of fire-prevention to a structure existing in the support of Suwon Friwon, on November 1, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 9, 2013.

[2] Defendant A is a person working as a bus driver at the I travel company located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City H, and Defendant B is an employee at the I travel company. The victim J is the representative director of the above I travel company (hereinafter “instant travel company”).

1. Joint crimes committed by the Defendants

A. From July 2012, the Defendants committed the embezzlement of K-free buses on the condition that the injured party redeems and uses K-free buses worth KRW 1,273,09 per month of the loan principle on behalf of the injured party, which was purchased in the name of the travel agency in the name of the pertinent travel agency (48 months) at a financial institution for installment loans (48 months). The Defendants received the said bus from the injured party under the high-priced high-priced bus in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City and kept it for the injured party.

On November 24, 2012, the Defendants conspired to deliver the above bus to L who is the creditor of the above B and embezzled it for the purpose of paying the debt amounting to KRW 40 million at the parking lot in which the exact location in the Dong-dong, Sincheon-gu, Sincheon-si is unknown.

B. On January 2014, Defendant A committed the crime of embezzlement of buses MX212: (a) on the condition that the victim purchased the bus in the name of the travel company of this case in the name of the travel company of this case for a financial institution installment loan (55 months); (b) on behalf of the damaged party, the bus purchase price of KRW 87,00,000 in the name of the travel company of this case was paid for and used for the amount of KRW 2,281,126 in the loan principle; and (c) on the part of the damaged party, Defendant A received the said bus from the injured party in the car trading company of which it is impossible to know the trade name in the Gu of Seocheon-si

During that period, the Defendants conspired to do so on June 2014 at a parking lot where the exact location in the Dong-dong of Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu is unknown.

arrow