Plaintiff and appellant
National Park Management Corporation (Law Firm Soho, Attorneys Kang Jae-sung et al., Counsel for defendant-appellant)
Defendant, Appellant
Head of Seongbuk District Tax Office and 16 others
The first instance judgment
Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2008Guhap46231 Decided June 4, 2009
Conclusion of Pleadings
December 16, 2009
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance court shall be revoked, and each disposition date of the attached Form No. 1 shall be revoked, each of the same statements that the Defendants made against the Plaintiff on the corresponding date, and each of the corresponding items in the "amount subject to revocation claim" shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The reasoning for the court's explanation on this case is the same as that for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it can be accepted by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the judgment of the first instance is just, and all appeals by the plaintiff are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.
[Attachment]
For the purpose of this title, the majority of the judges