logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.06 2015나21348
부당이득금반환
Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

3. The first instance.

Reasons

The reasoning of this Court is that the reasoning of the first instance judgment is the same as that of the first instance judgment, except for correcting “from June 10, 2014, which is the day following the delivery of a duplicate of the counterclaim” to “from June 11, 2014, which is the day following the delivery of a duplicate of the counterclaim” under the text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. Thus, this Court shall accept it pursuant to the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is justified, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed, and it is so decided as per Disposition because "from June 10, 2014 to June 11, 2014" in paragraph 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance is obvious that it is a clerical error in the text.

arrow