logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.06.21 2016나7343
차용금반환
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) regarding the counterclaim shall be revoked, and that part shall be revoked.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff wired each money in the “amount” column to the Defendant on each day indicated below.

순번 일시 금액 (원) 1 2012. 3. 16. 5,250,000 2 2012. 4. 9. 18,600,000 3 2012. 4. 21. 2,100,000 4 2012. 6. 8. 30,000,000 5 2012. 7. 25. 7,000,000 6 2013. 2. 18. 3,300,000 7 2013. 2. 28. 1,000,000 8 2013. 4. 2. 5,000,000 9 2013. 4. 28. 3,000,000 10 2013. 6. 10. 11,000,000 합계 86,250,000 순번 일시 계좌명의인 금액 (원) 1 2012. 1. 2. T 200,000 2 2012. 1. 3. T 2,600,000 3 2012. 2. 28. F 900,000 4 2012. 3. 9. G 4,500,000 5 2012. 3. 14. H 3,000,000 6 2012. 3. 16. E 2,250,000 7 2012. 3. 18. S 900,000 8 2012. 3. 19. U 1,850,000 9 2012. 3. 22. V 6,300,000 10 2012. 4. 7. I 18,600,000 11 2012. 4. 20. J 4,750,000 12 2012. 4. 23. U 1,800,000 13 2012. 4. 24. G 2,400,000 14 2012. 5. 5. K 5,000,000 15 2012. 5. 17. 원고 36,000,000 16 2012. 5. 21. 원고 4,800,000 17 2012. 6. 22. G 4,600,000 18 2012. 7. 3. G 4,700,000 19 2012. 8. 20. W 4,800,000 20 2012. 8. 29. 원고 1,000,000 21 2012. 11. 20. 원고 2,000,000 22 2012. 12. 5. 원고 3,920,000 23 2012. 12. 18. E 2,800,000 24 2012. 12. 20. L 2,700,000 25 2013. 3. 15. 원고 3,000,000 합계 125,370,000

B. The Defendant wired each of the money indicated on the “temporary” date to the Plaintiff and each of the persons indicated on the “account titleholder” as indicated below (hereinafter “each of the instant recipients”).

C. From March 13, 2012 to October 5, 2012, the Defendant: (a) remitted the sum of KRW 109,200,000 to D; (b) received KRW 73,290,000 from D; (c) on November 16, 2012, a notary public made and settled a notarial deed stating that the Defendant lent KRW 35,000,000 to D (hereinafter “notarial deed of this case”) at a law firm Nam-nam General Law Office as of November 16, 2012.

Punishment of the crime

The plaintiff from January 2012 to the victim's internal relationship with the defendant as the victim.

arrow