logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2014.08.14 2014구합2034
난민불인정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 12, 2011, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea with a short-term comprehensive visa (C-3, the period of stay 30 days) on October 25, 201, as a foreigner of the Federia’s nationality, and filed an application for refugee recognition with the Defendant on October 25, 2011.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant refugee application”). B.

On March 7, 2013, the Defendant rejected the instant refugee application on the ground that: (a) the Plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff would be subject to persecution as a refugee under Article 1 of the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (hereinafter referred to as the “Refugee”) and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (hereinafter referred to as the “Refugee Protocol”).

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”). C.

On April 15, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on April 15, 2013, but the objection was dismissed on December 23, 2013.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 (including a tentative number) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s father’s assertion beliefs that “Isiu Amuta” (hereinafter “the traditional religion of this case”) and both the Plaintiff and his mother believe that the rest of the family, such as the Plaintiff and the mother, are readers. However, the community of traditional religion of this case forced the Plaintiff to believe that the Plaintiff was a traditional religion, and the Plaintiff’s mother who believed that the Plaintiff was a arche, killed her mother by means of a defect in the traditional religion of this case in the church.

In addition, when the Plaintiff’s father was elected as a private fiction of the traditional religion of this case around 2011, according to custom that leads to sacrificeing the south of the deceased head in the above traditional religion, people of the above traditional religious believers forced to find the Plaintiff and return to the Plaintiff.

arrow