1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Pakistan on December 30, 201 and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on March 29, 2012, after having entered the Republic of Korea.

The defendant, on December 3, 2013, “a well-founded fear of persecution” (the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012; hereinafter the same shall apply)

) On the ground that Article 2 Subparag. 3 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees cannot be deemed to exist (hereinafter “instant disposition”), a disposition for non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on January 22, 2014, but was dismissed on September 30, 2014.

[Based on recognition, the Plaintiff asserted the legitimacy of the disposition of this case as to Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 1, and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings, and the purport of the disposition of this case was lawful, and the Plaintiff worked at the oil sales store operated by referring while residing in the Kagora City of

The plaintiff joined a political party in the name of "Muta Quami" (hereinafter referred to as "MMM"), and if there are persons who request merchants to pay taxes, the plaintiff was in charge of reporting it to the parties to QM.

On January 201, the Plaintiff informed that the Aman Common Meeting demands a large number of states including the Plaintiff’s referred, and reported it to QM.

M QM party members called the police to the site where only A community demands self-sufficiency, and only A community members went away without self-sufficiency.

After that, on March 20, 201, the Plaintiff was subject to the total attack from the Russian community.

The plaintiff entered the affected Republic of Korea because there is a risk of retaliation from the community of Adon, and the disposition of this case which did not recognize the plaintiff as a refugee is unlawful.

relevant laws and regulations;