A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Obstruction of business;

A. On May 5, 2015, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the victim’s business operation by force by avoiding disturbances for about five minutes; (b) in a “C” restaurant operated by the victim B, which is located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; and (c) in a “C” restaurant operated by the victim B, the name and influence of the table table table, among fooding, made it difficult for customers to enter the table, and obstructed the victim’s business operation by force.

B. On June 25, 2015, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the victim’s business operation by force by avoiding disturbance for about 15 minutes; (b) in the “E restaurant” operated by the victim D in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do; and (c) in the “E restaurant” operated by the victim D, who received a request for food payment from the victim; and (d) taking the victim’s talk to the victim; and (e) taking the victim’s wish to pay the food, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s business operation

(c)

On April 26, 2016, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the business affairs of the victim by force by avoiding disturbance for about one hour; (b) in the “G” restaurant for the operation of the Victim F in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; and (c) in the same manner as Paragraph (a).

(d)

On April 26, 2016, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the victim’s business operation by force by avoiding disturbance for about 90 minutes; (b) in a “I” restaurant operated by the victim H in Ulsan-gu on April 26, 2016; and (c) taking the bath in the same manner as paragraph (a).

2. On December 2015, the Defendant, at the “cafeteria” restaurant operated by the Victim J (J, 51 years old), in Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do on a date 00:00, received food equivalent to the market price of KRW 4,000, and received a demand from the injured party for the payment of the money, provided the victim with the desire that it is difficult for the injured party to put the fright in the fright, and had the frightered victim with the fright to claim the payment of the money, and acquired the pecuniary benefits equivalent to the fright amount of the money.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to J, D, B, and H;

1. Each statement;

1. Each photograph;

1. The criminal place;

1. A report on investigation;

1. 112 Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning reported data;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act of this Act concerning criminal facts.