logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.10.13 2017고단3394
사기등
Text

The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than three months for the crimes of No. 1 of the judgment of the court, and the crimes of No. 2, 3 and 4 of the judgment of the court.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 28, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for six months, due to a violation of road traffic laws (unlicensed driving) in the Seo-gu District Court Branch of the Daegu District Court on August 28, 201, and such sentence is

9. The same year, which became final and conclusive on February 2, 2017, after being sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a total of one year and ten months for fraud, etc. in the Western District Court Branch Branch on February 2, 2017.

5. 5. The judgment became final and conclusive.

1. The criminal defendant against the victim C had an obligation of approximately KRW 250,000 or more,00,000,000,000,000 or more per month due to monthly salary, public charges, loans, personal debt repayment, etc. while operating “E” from November 21, 2013 to June 30, 2015, and there was no intention or ability to repay the debt even if he/she borrowed money from the victim.

On March 4, 2014, the Defendant paid KRW 250,000 to the victim C in the above E, “The amount of KRW 50,000 shall be paid to the lessor F.”

In the case of lending KRW 5,00,000, the lessor made a false statement that he/she would pay a deposit to the lessor and make a contract for the same kind of business.

However, at the time, the Defendant was expected to use the E’s operating fund as operating funds, such as goods prices and monthly pay, even if he received money from the mother and child damage, and as such, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay such money even if he borrowed money from the damaged party.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was given 50 million won as the borrowed money from the damaged party.

2. Fraud, etc. against victims G;

A. Although the lease contract of the building E expires on June 30, 2015, the Defendant’s use of a private document forgery and the use of the above investigation document was completed on November 2014 at the Seogu Daegu-gu Office and the Defendant’s “E” wedding office operated by the Defendant, it seems that the lease contract of the building E remains for a long period after the termination of the lease contract period on June 30, 2016.

arrow