A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

On September 5, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of official duties for six months by obstructing the execution of official duties in the Seo-gu District Court Branch Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 13, 2014.

1. Fraud;

A. On July 2013, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant borrowed money from the victim C in order to repair the interior of the Esing room operated by the Defendant in the Nam-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daejeon-gu, that “The Defendant shall lend KRW 50 million to the victim.”

However, there was no fact that the defendant had been operating singinging, had been thought to use money as debt repayment, entertainment expenses, etc. from the victim, and there was no intention or ability to repay it.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 50 million from the injured party on or around July 20, 2013 as the borrowed money.

B. On March 2014, the Defendant lent KRW 50 million to the victim’s house located in Daegu-gu Month-gu, 108 Dong 906, to the victim’s house in the victim’s house, “The Defendant borrowed KRW 50,000,000 to operate singing in lickites.”

However, even if the defendant borrows money from the injured party, he/she thought that he/she will be used as debt repayment, entertainment expenses, etc. without any intention or ability to operate the G singing room, and there was no intention or ability to repay it

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 50 million from the injured party on or around March 24, 2014 as the borrowed money.

2. Forgery of private documents and the uttering of a falsified investigation document;

A. The Defendant borrowed KRW 50 million from C for the purpose of running a singing, and demanded a security, and the Defendant, even though he paid KRW 4.5 million to H with the premium, he did not wish to arbitrarily prepare a real estate lease agreement in which the amount of the premium was falsely stated as if it were the cause of KRW 20 million, and deliver it to C as a security.

The Defendant was on April 2014 at the office of the Defendant I, 203 Dong 116, Daegu-gu.