1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Therefore, it is acceptable to accept it as it is by the main sentence of Article 4

2. On the 2nd page of the judgment of the court of first instance, the phrase "founded grounds for recognition" in the 4th page of the judgment of the court of second instance shall be changed to the phrase "recognition."

The first instance court's 4th to 6th 1th 1th 6th 7th 7th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th

3. Judgment on the defendant's defense of extinction of prescription

A. The defendant asserted that the amount claimed by the plaintiff is excluded from the amount settled in the area among the fourth intermediate payments and the remainder under the lease contract of this case, but the payment deadline of the fourth intermediate payment was July 25, 2009 and the payment deadline of the remainder was October 25, 2009, and since the defendant was not notified by the plaintiff about the deferment of payment period, the payment deadline was suspended at all, it did not have any fact that the payment deadline was deferred. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant for the above sales price was terminated by the expiration of five-year commercial prescription period.

B. Article 166 of the Civil Act provides, “The extinctive prescription shall run from the time when a right can be exercised.” As such, the extinctive prescription of a claim with a time limit runs from the time when the time when the time limit expires, but where the obligee and the obligor have agreed to postpone the time limit after such time limit comes due, the extinctive prescription shall resume from the time when the changed time

The agreement of deferment of time is explicitly and explicitly possible, and it is necessary to comprehensively consider all the circumstances such as the process and contents of the contract, process of performance, and existence of an implied agreement of deferment of time in any case in the contractual credit relationship.

(Supreme Court Decision 2016Da274904 Decided April 13, 2017). C.

In this case, the health unit and the foregoing.