logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2019.02.13 2018고단463
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 4,00,000 won and by imprisonment of 6 months for each of the defendants B.

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B

A. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accident) are those engaged in driving CK7 cars.

On January 30, 2018, the Defendant driven the above car at around 19:20 and proceeded at about 30 km from the surface of the apartment site to the E industry company, depending on the three-lanes in front of the village distance, according to the three-lanes of the village located in Pyeongtaek-si Do.

At the same direction as the defendant's moving direction at the time, G Pod SP car driven by the victim F (n, 33 years old) is proceeding along the defendant's car in the same direction. In such a case, the driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating the front line and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and interest of the driver.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and changed the vehicle line into two lanes as it is, and the part on the right side of the passenger car driving by the victim was shocked into the left side of the vehicle of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant by such negligence sustained injury to the victim, such as salt ties and tensions, which require treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, escaped without immediately stopping a vehicle driving the victim with approximately KRW 4,273,450, such as replacement of back-of-lifeers, and without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

B. Even though the Defendant had caused a traffic accident, as described in the preceding paragraph, even though he returned to the cheon where there was a company that visited and worked in Pyeongtaek-si along with the daily activities, such as A and H, he would have caused a traffic accident as in the preceding paragraph, and thus, it would have been discovered that he was exposed due to various criminal cases with respect to himself, and would have caused a traffic accident while driving the said K7 car in lieu of himself.

arrow