The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is recognized by the evidence that the defendant paid the price nine times to women in sexual traffic C and engaged in sexual traffic, but the court below acquitted the defendant of the facts charged in this case. The court below erred by misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles.

2. On May 28, 2015, the Defendant: (a) paid KRW 100,000 to Da, a woman engaged in sexual traffic, and (b) paid KRW 100,00,00 to Da, a single sexual intercourse, and (c) engaged in sexual intercourse in around May 28, 2015; and (

6. Payment of 150,000 won to the above C at the Doel adjacent to the Bel around 29.2, engaging in sexual traffic, and engaging in sexual traffic; and

7. around 27.27. Payment of 100,000 won to the above C at the above DNA, engaging in commercial sex acts, and the same year.

8. around 16.16. Payment of 200,000 won to the above C at the above Del and engage in sexual traffic, and the same year.

9. From January 16, 200 to pay 250,000 won to the above DNA, engaging in commercial sex acts, and paying 100,000 won to the above DNA from November 23, 200 to the above DNA, and engaging in commercial sex acts around December 15, 200 to pay 30,000 won to the above DNA at the above DNA, and engaging in commercial sex acts on January 18, 2016 to pay 10,000 won to the above DNA, and engaging in commercial sex acts at the above DNA.

1. At around 31.3, at the above DMoel, the said C paid KRW 100,000 to the said C and engaged in sexual traffic.

Accordingly, the defendant paid the price of sexual traffic to C over nine times in total and provided sexual traffic with C.

3. The lower court rendered a not guilty verdict on the facts charged of this case on the grounds that it is difficult to believe C’s statement as it is and there is no other evidence to prove the facts charged of this case in light of the following circumstances.

The defendant stated that he would be in conflict with C, and the following circumstances are consistent with the defendant's statement:

1 C shall make phone calls first to the defendant on the commemorative day that can be exchanged with gifts between people, such as so-called paintings, deduction, etc.