logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2016.06.23 2015가단218555
위자료
Text

1. Defendant E is the Plaintiff’s KRW 54,285,714, Plaintiff B, and C, respectively, KRW 37,857,142, and Defendant D is the Defendant E.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) is a company managing “G officetels” located in Sungnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, and Defendant E is an employee of Defendant Co., Ltd. who has engaged in the business related to the electricity and equipment of the instant officetels.

H (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) is an employee of the Defendant Company who has been in charge of the above officetel accounting, and the Plaintiff A is the husband of the deceased, and the Plaintiff B and C are the children of the deceased.

B. Defendant E thought that he would monitor himself and report his attitude to I under the direction of the Director of the Management Office I, and Defendant E thought that he would be able to say that he would make the horses to himself without permission and that he should give instructions to him, and that he would bring an objection to the deceased.

C. Defendant E was recommended by I to resign on the grounds of “unfaithed working attitude,” and did not comply with it on December 2014.

However, in July 2015, after being rejected the extension of the labor contract between the defendant company and the defendant company, the deceased thought that it was a cause for I to talk about I's attitude of his work in a usual manner.

At around 09:50 on July 24, 2015, Defendant E stored a width in the warehouse of the first floor of the instant officetel, and found it as a management office where the deceased was on the deceased’s work, and “it is not known that the deceased was deadly,” and Defendant E was released to the deceased by putting the width in a newspaper.

As a result, the deceased died on the same day by suffering the images of 3 degrees of telegraph.

2. Determination

A. The part of Defendant E’s claim against Defendant E is liable for damages caused by the deceased’s and their bereaved family members’ emotional distress.

Furthermore, we examine the amount of consolation money.

The consolation money for murder resulting from the act of murder, as in this case, shall be the motive or method of murder, the circumstances after murder, and the offender, victim and victim.

arrow