beta
Text
1. Defendant E: (a) KRW 7,111,111 for each of the Plaintiff A and each of the said money to the Plaintiff B, C, and D, respectively; (b) April 26, 2018.
Reasons
1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant E
A. As to the cause of the claim, the following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged according to the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 13 and the entire arguments. A) Network G (hereinafter “the deceased”) died on September 5, 2017. The heir is Plaintiff B, C, and D, the wife of Plaintiff H and his/her children.
B) On July 5, 2011, the Deceased lent KRW 10,000,00 to Defendant E and received a certificate of borrowing, and at the time of his/her death, the Deceased kept the certificate of borrowing. In addition, on January 25, 2016, the Deceased wired KRW 5,00,000 to Defendant E and lent the money to Defendant E, and at the time of his/her death, the Deceased kept the certificate of confirmation of the details of the remittance at the time of his/her death (hereinafter each of the above loans together referred to as “loan
(C) Around February 2016, the Deceased lent KRW 5,000,000 to Defendant E, and Defendant E again lent KRW 5,000,000 to I on February 11, 2016 and received a loan certificate from I.
In addition, around April 2016, the Deceased lent KRW 5,000,000 to Defendant E, and Defendant E again lends KRW 5,000,000 to I and received a loan from I.
Defendant E delivered each of the above loans to the deceased prepared by Defendant E, and the deceased was in custody at the time of his death.
(2) On March 16, 2017, the Deceased loaned KRW 5,000,000 to Defendant E, and Defendant E lent KRW 5,000,00 to J on the same day, and Defendant E directly transferred the money to the Deceased for a deposit account in the name of K, which is his father’s father. Defendant E received a loan from J, and the Deceased delivered the money to the Deceased at the time of his death. In addition, on August 17, 2017, the Deceased lent KRW 2,00,000 to Defendant E, and Defendant E re- loaned this money to J (hereinafter referred to as “loan”).
(2) According to the above facts of recognition, Defendant E is under special circumstances.