logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.09.26 2013고단1375
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 25, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for habitual fraud, etc. in the Suwon District Court's Ansan branch on September 25, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Ansan Prison on March 2, 2013.

2013 Highest 1375

1. The Defendant, around 11:00 on March 26, 2013, at E-cafeteria operated by the victim D in Gwangju-dong-gu, Gwangju-gu, the Defendant: (a) deceiving the victim as if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the price even if he/she orders alcohol and food; and (b) by deceiving the victim as if he/she did not have the intent or ability to pay the price, and was provided with 12,00 won and 2 illness from the victim.

2. On March 28, 2013, the Defendant: (a) had the victim G in the Dong-gu, Gwangju; (b) had the intent or ability to pay the price even when issuing an order for alcohol and food; (c) had the victim induced the victim as if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the price, and had the victim paid the price normally; and (d) had the victim been provided with 12,000 won and 2 disease.

On March 22, 2013, the Defendant ordered food at the “K” restaurant operated by the Victim JJ in Suwon-si, Suwon-si on March 22, 2013.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, was issued from the victim, one head of the 10,000 Won at the market price, which is the victim’s possession, and one disease of the head of the 10,000.

2013 Highest 3294

1. On June 27, 2013, around 07:25, the Defendant ordered food as if he/she had an employee’s intent or ability to pay the price to the victim N, an employee, at the cafeteria located in Ansan-si L.

However, even if the defendant was provided with food, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the price.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received from the victim 13,000 won or more at the market price, and was subject to two soldiers.

2. Obstruction of operations;

arrow