The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Punishment of the crime

On February 6, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and two years and six months for attempted rape in the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 12, 2015.

At around 21:00 on November 21, 2014, the Defendant entered the “C” main point located in Sinsi-si B, and made the said main point leave the site by getting the victim D, who is the said main place of business, refused to do this. However, he saw the victim’s flab, and saw the victim’s flab, “Seb flab flab flab walk,” and expressed the victim’s flab flab flab flab flab flab, etc., for about 1:30 minutes from that time.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's bar business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. E statements;

1. Investigative reports (Submission of moving pictures) and video CDs;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of investigation report (report on confirmation of the fixed date by Defendant A)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and the former part of Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of the latter part of Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act exempted from punishment (the degree of interference with the business of the defendant in this case and equality, etc. in the case of concurrent judgment with the crime of attempted rape in a final judgment);